Monday, April 25, 2005
Something to think about
Some people don't think it's necessary to wait for the Gomery commission to finish its inquiry before holding an election, because they feel that they don't need a judge to interpret the evidence for them. That is a perfectly valid point of view and entirely their prerogative. However, it does occur to me that we might want to wait at least until all the witnesses have given their testimony. After all, imagine if an election had been held before Jean Brault testified...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
_The election must be right now or next February after it's all over!
_Fall is an impossibility, I just don't know exactly why.
After all, imagine if an election had been held before Jean Brault testified
An election was held before he testified. Remember Martin called the last election while this hearing was underway, undoubtedly hoping he could scuttle the hearings when they were returned to office. (thank god he didn't get a majority) He had to know what was in the wings.
See what happens when they hold an election before everyone testifies? :)
Post a Comment