Saturday, May 23, 2009

How to promote safer teen sexual behaviour: put the clitoris on the map

The sex ed I received in school was thorough and very informative, but it was focused entirely on preventing pregnancy and STD transmission, with no information about sexual pleasure. As a result, I didn't come away with any knowledge of specific sex acts, and I didn't learn about the clitoris there.

My parents had the good judgement to give me a book about "your changing body" that included slightly more sex ed information, including the location and function of the clitoris. It was quite the revelation, but I'm not sure if it was common knowledge among my peers. I remember in Grade 12 a classmate did her World Issues presentation on female genital mutilation, and she did think it was necessary to briefly mention in passing what the clitoris actually is. She most likely had a larger sample size than I did from which to determine how fluent in the geography of the vulva our classmates would be, so it is likely that a significant number of people did not know about the clitoris. Obviously everyone learns about it eventually, but it seems that a significant number of people spent several years of their sexually-aware life without knowing about the clitoris, and this was at the same age where the general social goal is to reduce risky sexual behaviour.

The sex ed I received, both at school and at home, was very reproduction-focused. It started with where babies come from, and moved on into birth control and STDs in a broader context of how to manage your changing body. That did make sense - my 10-year-old self who still thought boys were yucky didn't need to know much more than if a penis goes in your vagina you might get pregnant. However, because of this necessary focus on penises going into vaginas, and the tacit and societal implication that sex is like the ultimate in pleasure, we came away with the idea that penile-vaginal intercourse is the ultimate in pleasure. (I know this is all very heterocentric, but that's how my sex ed was. And because I'm extrapolating from my childhood sex ed, this blog post as a whole is probably going to come out heterocentric.)

However, as we all know, you can have a lot of fun stimulating the clitoris and for many women it is more pleasurable than vaginal penetration. And we also know that penetrative sex acts are higher risk than non-penetrative sex acts. So if sex ed gives people the idea that the ultimate in pleasure is a non-penetrative act, they will be more likely to go for that non-penetrative act instead of higher-risk penetrative acts.

So here's how to do it: include the clitoris on the diagram. In my sex ed, we had to memorize diagrams of the male and female reproductive organs and learn the function of each part. Simply include the clitoris on the female diagram, say that its purpose is to provide physical pleasure, and leave it at that. Yes, it's not immediately related to reproduction, but neither are the prostate or the vas deferens or the labia majora or the fallopian tubes, and we had to learn all those. No need to go into great detail, just mention it in passing like you do the vas deferens, along with the idea that it's the place to go for sexual pleasure, all before most of the kids have started experimenting sexually.

Then when they do start experimenting sexually, they're going to want to spend some time on the clitoris. Not all time is going to be spent on the clitoris, obviously, because the boys are still going to want the odd orgasm, but girls who are after orgasms and the boys who want to be sex gods (as opposed to the boys who just want to stick their penis in something) are going to go stampeding towards the clitoris. And as teens tend to have more limited time and opportunity to spend on sex, the more time that is spent on the clitoris means less time will be spent on penetration.

There is a school of thought whereby penile-vaginal penetration is not to be engaged in before marriage but other sex acts are acceptable, and this overlaps a school of thought wherein people are not to be taught how to protect themselves from STDs. Mentioning the clitoris here would be particularly beneficial, because unprotected cunnilingus and frottage and manual stimulation are much lower-risk activities and are certainly safer than unprotected saddlebacking.

Simple knowledge of the existence and function of the clitoris will get a large portion of teens interested in engaging in low-risk sexual behaviours when they do have the inclination and opportunity for sexual activity. There's no need to change sex ed, no need to talk about technique, no need to change whatever values are conveyed. Just make sure that this one part of the human anatomy is included and labelled on every anatomical diagram, just like the vas deferens, and nature will take its course.

3 comments:

laura k said...

It's a great idea. But the reason it hasn't happened yet, and probably never will, is that it would mean acknowledging female sexual desire and stimulation outside of procreative sex. Most conventional sex ed information seem to be absent this entirely.

impudent strumpet said...

The very clever book I had as a kid didn't even get into desire or stimulation. It just labelled the clitoris, and if I remember correctly defined the word clitoris in the glossary.

The glossary used the conceit "Here are some words and concepts you might hear people talk about," then included words such as cunnilingus, fellatio, sodomy, masturbation, etc. and an assortment of slang equivalents. It defined those words and then left them at that - nothing about technique, no value judgements, no condescending "When a man and a woman love each other very much..." explanations. Just [term] = [verb]ing the [noun] with the [noun].

As a result I got the existence of these concepts in my head long before I ever had the need to use them in real life, so I could mull them over and decide how I felt about them well in advance rather than being blindsided with "You want to WHAT???"

I wish I could remember the name of that book so I could recommend it to parents I know. All I remember is it was British and had cartoons.

impudent strumpet said...

Also, now that I think about it, the existence of a non-vaginal centre of female pleasure is actually quite complementary to some of the procreation-only and other less sex-positive philosophies.

"This part of your body is for your husband only" is a lot more convincing when accompanied by "This other part is for you." The idea that vaginal intercourse should be for reproductive purposes only is a lot more credible when supported by the fact that the pleasure centre is elsewhere.

It could be used to reinforce the idea that men and women are meant to have separate roles - they don't even get pleasure from the same act! (Yeah, they'll eventually figure out the right position, but we're talking early indoctrination here.) It could even have a role in the eve-tempted-adam madonna/whore mindset. Some slut tempting you with her feminine wiles? Press this button here and you can leave with your purity intact for your future wife!